Poetry on a Pedestal

At some point in your past one of your teachers dragged a large pedestal out into the middle of the classroom. She then stood on it, complete with royal music and halo-esque light and said “We shall now read from this sacred book of poetry.” From then on, you have this view that poetry is something complicated, something off, something that has to be studied.

Poetry is not something to be hidden away; to be enjoyed by a select few that sit in hardwood offices, drink Lattes and read poetry because they ‘get it’. There is nothing to get. Poetry is language, it is words, it is sound and rhythm, if you speak you can read poetry, if you breath you can understand it.

Those fancy terms you learned in English class: alliteration, metaphor, assonance, hyperbole, etc, they are about style, about form, they are about structure. They are not, however, part of ‘liking’ or ‘getting’ poetry. You can be able to dissect a poem down to each literary device used, to the symbolism, even to the etymology of the chosen words. These things will help you APPRECIATE a poem. But liking it? That is something different.

Read it. Try it out loud. Listen to it. You will like the poem or you won’t.

Does that make these literary devices useless? No. They are still the tools of the trade, the blocks that constructs poems. However, the poet does not (usually) sit and say “In this verse I shall insert a metaphor and precisely four occurances of alliteration.” The poet is writing, picking what they like, taking away what they don’t. Dissection is not a part of the creative proccess (again, usually), so don’t think it is a part of the reading process.

So go, read a poem.

What if Train: Apple and Yahoo

(So I started this before Microsoft’s Bid this weekend. Figured I’d finish it anyway)

Recently, Steve Jobs went to a Yahoo conference and gave a speech to Yahoo about themselves. He told them “The company with one of the largest Internet user bases can do and achieve anything…” Steve Jobs was giving Yahoo a pep-talk.

So this has made me start to wonder. Let’s take a trip on the what-if train, shall we?

What if Apple wants to buy Yahoo. Microsoft has has MSN for quite some time now. While Apple has .Mac, it pales in offerings as compared to Google or Yahoo. Yahoo has the componets already. Not to meantion, Microsoft has expressed a desire to purchase Yahoo. Apple would be wise to prevent Yahoo’s aquisition by Microsoft.

Yahoo has made great efforts in the Mobile internet offerings. Apple has the phone, Yahoo has the services, the two put together would create a great package for iPhone users.

And the thought of intergrating iPhoto and Flickr makes me giggle.

Ok, so let’s not go quite that far on the What if Train. What if Apple is looking to partner more with Yahoo? They already have Yahoo on the iPhone and integrated into the Leopard Address Book (iCal and iPhoto next?), Apple could certainly use a company like Yahoo to provide more Mac specific tools for its users.

Let us not forget Zimbra, which fits into both of these senerios. Zimbra, the opensource groupware program is one of the leading competitions for Exchange. While the Zimbra team is making efforts to increase Mac compatibility, it isn’t quite the Windows+Exchange package. Zimbra + Mac OSX Server + Pretty GUI Admin panels and you have an option for those people who don’t want Exchange. Plus, Zimbra is already compatible with the Blackberry, adding iPhone capability would turn the iPhone into a full-fledged business machine.

In the end, this is just a ‘What-if’. In the end, Apple probably has no concern either way over Yahoo!. Despite some integration features, such as Flickr – iPhoto, messeger – iChat, (probably many more) the addition of Yahoo wouldn’t be worth it to Apple. Yahoo certainly should start providing more interoperability between their services and Macintosh users (hint hint), which would pull users their way, who, let’s face it, are left out a lot of the time.

And maybe Mr. Jobs was just there to give a pep-talk.

But, what if?

Stages of Writing

Using my own past as reference, I’ve come up with what I see as the stages of writing. Which stage are you in?

Stage One

You realize that you hate everything you have written. You are learning style, form, you understand what you like and don’t. This critical eye is turned inwards, and there you are unhappy.

Because of this stage, you have stopped writing.

Stage Two

You start writing anyway. Coming off of stage one you believe only Greatness deserves to be written down, and nothing else will do. Eventually you overcome this and start to write. It helps if there are deadlines involved.

Stage Three

You realize you were wrong at Stage One. Not totally, this new critical eye is still there, but you have removed it further from yourself. But now you can find the style, the gems, the things from the past worth saving.

Stage Four

You write. Like a bad out of Hell.

Stage Five

You slow down. Here you are distracted. By life, love, school. The pen is second. the pen is third. The pen is when the pen fits in. You still dream, but your dreams are getting forgotten.

There is no Stage Six. There is only dragging your ass back to Stage Four.